Port Orford-Langlois School District 2J
Port Orford-Langlois School District 2J is located in west Oregon. Port Orford-Langlois School District 2J has 352.68 square miles of land area and 162.09 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Port Orford-Langlois School District 2J population is 3,485. Port Orford-Langlois School District 2J median household income is $36,314 in 2010-2014. Port Orford-Langlois School District 2J median house value is $189,200 in 2010-2014. On average, Port Orford-Langlois School District 2J is much better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Port Orford-Langlois School District 2J Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 233 | 260 | 252 | 283 | 286 | 302 | 321 |
English Language Learner Students: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 14.17 | 15.85 | 15.85 | 18.56 | 20.00 | 23.60 | 25.80 |
Prekindergarten: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | 0.32 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.85 | 1.20 | 1.30 | 0.90 |
Elementary: | 6.36 | 7.38 | 8.00 | 8.16 | 8.97 | 12.70 | 13.60 |
Secondary: | 7.49 | 7.84 | 7.22 | 9.55 | 9.83 | 9.60 | 11.30 |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Total Other Staff: | 26.68 | 25.81 | 27.15 | 28.13 | 30.85 | 35.90 | 40.60 |
Instructional Aides: | 6.24 | 5.67 | 6.62 | 7.14 | 9.36 | 10.90 | 7.40 |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | 1.00 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | NA | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 1.88 | 1.94 | 1.94 | 1.83 | 1.85 | 1.80 | 0.00 |
District Administrators: | 0.50 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
District Administrative Support: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 10.80 | 10.50 |
School Administrators: | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.50 | 2.50 |
School Administrative Support: | 2.00 | 2.01 | 2.00 | 2.50 | 3.44 | 7.90 | 16.70 |
Student Support Services: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Other Support Services: | 11.68 | 11.15 | 11.57 | 11.91 | 11.20 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 16.44 | 16.40 | 15.90 | 15.25 | 14.30 | 12.80 | 12.44 |
Schools
Driftwood Elementary School | Kindergarten to Grade 8 | 1202 Oregon St, Port Orford OR 97465 | |
Pacific High School | Grade 9 to Grade 12 | 45525 Hwy 101, Port Orford OR 97465 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
OAKS Test | |||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 46.9% | 43.2% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 48.3% | 46.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 42.4% | 45% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 50% | 55% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 52% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 52.9% | 54% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 41.7% | 53.6% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 68% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 66% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 54.2% | 69% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 53.1% | 50.5% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.2% | 53.5% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 54.5% | 55% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 66% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 65% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 66% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 66.1% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 95% | 83% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 84% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 85% |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.5% | 59.1% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.1% | 60.5% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 60.6% | 62% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.8% | 57% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.6% | 58% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 70% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 64% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 63% |
2004 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 65.6% | 48% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 54.4% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 55% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 42.3% | 55% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.1% | N/A |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 55% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.1% | 53.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 68% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 67% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 60% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 81.9% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 86.1% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 86% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 40.9% | 70% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 77% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 76.5% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 63% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 64% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 61% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 83% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 85.5% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 87% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 83% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 84% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 83% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 82.8% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 83% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 70% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 66% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 88% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 72% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 77% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 77.2% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 65% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 66% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 41.2% | 64% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 87% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 80% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 81% | 83% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 84% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 85% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 74% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 58.8% | 73% |
2005 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 50% | 32.4% |
2006 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 39.1% | 42% |
2007 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 75% | 45% |
2008 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 52.4% | 43% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.8% | 78.9% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 84% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 85% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 68% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 77% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 90% | 76.5% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 58.8% | 58% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 35% | 60% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 58% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 76.8% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 81.4% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 83% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 72% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 75% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 76% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 95% | 76.3% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 78% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 50% | 69% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 68% |
2004 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.1% | 69.9% |
2005 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 81% | 75% |
2006 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 79% |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 75% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 75% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 90% | 74.4% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 74% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 85% | 69% |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 67% |
2004 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 28.2% | 33.2% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 77% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 71% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 70% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 73% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 76.5% | 72.8% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 59% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 47.1% | 59% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 40.0% | 59% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 80% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 75% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 73% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 77% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 76.5% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 79% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 47.1% | 65% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 60.0% | 63% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.1% | 71% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 69.6% | 74% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 74% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 84% | 78% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 88% | 77.8% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 60% | 61% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 65% | 63% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 23.5% | 61% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 52.8% | 73% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 87% | 77% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 74% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 88% | 77% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 77.3% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 95% | 80% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 85% | 75% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 58.8% | 73% |
2005 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 42.4% | 39.4% |
2006 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 42.9% | 45% |
2007 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 56.5% | 48% |
2008 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 62.1% | 50% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 60.5% | 59.8% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 65.4% | 63.5% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 71.9% | 66% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 68.6% | 70% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 69% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 71% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 70.6% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 65% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 55% | 65% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 56.3% | 63% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 60% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 62.5% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 75% | 66% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 69% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 65% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 70% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 69.5% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 72% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85% | 68% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 67% |
2004 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 59% |
2005 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 65.8% |
2006 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.1% | 68% |
2008 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 69% |
2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 72.4% | 72% |
2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.6% | 70.8% |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 71% |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 90% | 66% |
2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 66% |
2004 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 40.5% | 37.2% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $3,692,000 | $14,651 | $3,614,000 | $12,770 | $4,655,000 | $16,276 | |||
Federal: | $449,000 | $1,782 | 12.2% | $671,000 | $2,371 | 18.6% | $931,000 | $3,255 | 20.0% |
State: | $1,523,000 | $6,044 | 41.3% | $1,392,000 | $4,919 | 38.5% | $2,112,000 | $7,385 | 45.4% |
Local: | $1,720,000 | $6,825 | 46.6% | $1,551,000 | $5,481 | 42.9% | $1,612,000 | $5,636 | 34.6% |
Total Expenditures: | $3,890,000 | $15,437 | $3,871,000 | $13,678 | $4,897,000 | $17,122 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $3,775,000 | $14,980 | $3,867,000 | $13,664 | $4,472,000 | $15,636 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $1,890,000 | $7,500 | 50.1% | $2,125,000 | $7,509 | 55.0% | $2,344,000 | $8,196 | 52.4% |
Student and Staff Support: | $270,000 | $1,071 | 7.2% | $271,000 | $958 | 7.0% | $285,000 | $997 | 6.4% |
Administration: | $597,000 | $2,369 | 15.8% | $533,000 | $1,883 | 13.8% | $640,000 | $2,238 | 14.3% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $1,018,000 | $4,040 | 27.0% | $938,000 | $3,314 | 24.3% | $1,203,000 | $4,206 | 26.9% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $115,000 | $456 | $0 | $0 | $424,000 | $1,483 | |||
Construction: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Salary: | $1,722,000 | $6,833 | $1,799,000 | $6,357 | $2,002,000 | $7,000 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $1,020,000 | $4,048 | 59.2% | $1,148,000 | $4,057 | 63.8% | $1,308,000 | $4,573 | 65.3% |
Other Salary: | $702,000 | $2,786 | 40.8% | $651,000 | $2,300 | 36.2% | $694,000 | $2,427 | 34.7% |
Total Benefit: | $1,122,000 | $4,452 | $1,123,000 | $3,968 | $1,181,000 | $4,129 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $645,000 | $2,560 | 57.5% | $652,000 | $2,304 | 58.1% | $732,000 | $2,559 | 62.0% |
Other Benefit: | $477,000 | $1,893 | 42.5% | $471,000 | $1,664 | 41.9% | $449,000 | $1,570 | 38.0% |
* Port Orford-Langlois School District 2J was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.